Given a theorem th, the theorem-tactic IMP_RES_TAC uses RES_CANON to
derive a canonical list of implications, each of which has the form:
A |- u1 ==> u2 ==> ... ==> un ==> v
IMP_RES_TAC then tries to repeatedly ‘resolve’ these theorems
against the assumptions of a goal by attempting to match the antecedents u1,
u2, ..., un (in that order) to some assumption of the goal (i.e. to some
candidate antecedents among the assumptions). If all the antecedents can be
matched to assumptions of the goal, then an instance of the theorem
called a ‘final resolvent’ is obtained by repeated specialization of
the variables in the implicative theorem, type instantiation, and applications
of modus ponens. If only the first i antecedents u1, ..., ui can be
matched to assumptions and then no further matching is possible, then the final
resolvent is an instance of the theorem:
A u {a1,...,ai} |- u(i+1) ==> ... ==> v
All the final resolvents obtained in this way (there may be several,
since an antecedent ui may match several assumptions) are added to the
assumptions of the goal, in the stripped form produced by using
STRIP_ASSUME_TAC. If the conclusion of any final resolvent is a
contradiction ‘F’ or is alpha-equivalent to the conclusion of the goal, then
IMP_RES_TAC solves the goal.